Steelman
Straw man
Also called strawman, man of straw, refutation by caricature.
Misrepresenting someone’s position to make it easier to attack.
What it is
Replacing an opponent’s actual position with a distorted, exaggerated or oversimplified version that they would not endorse, then refuting that version as if the real position had been refuted.
The pattern
A claims X. B restates it as Y, a weaker or more extreme version. B refutes Y. B concludes X is refuted.
An example
A: “Maybe we could go to the beach a little less this summer. The parking alone is costing us a fortune.”
B: “So you want us to sit at home all summer and never have any fun? No thanks.”
A suggested going a bit less often to save money. B attacks a far more extreme plan, staying home all summer, that A never proposed.
Why it fails
Defeating Y says nothing about X. The swap works because Y sounds close enough to X that listeners miss the change. Common tricks include exaggerating (“so you want to ban all…”), dropping qualifiers (“some” becomes “all”) and quoting out of context.
When it’s not a fallacy
Most lists skip this part. Calling a fair point a fallacy is a mistake too.
It can be fair when
- You’re drawing out a genuine implication of their view and asking whether they accept it.
- Your summary is accurate and they would agree with it. Paraphrasing isn’t distorting.
Try one
A question from the app. The wrong answers are its usual look-alikes.
Forum thread. Ines: “I’d love an optional assist mode, off by default, like Celeste has. Slow the game down a little for players with shaky hands.” Kofi: “The point of these games is that you earn every win. If the final boss goes down without a fight, nobody’s proud of beating him. I’d rather the devs spend that time on new levels.” Ines: “Sure. New levels would be nice too.”
What’s the flaw?
Ines asked for an optional mode that slows the game slightly for players who need it. Kofi argues against a boss that goes down without a fight, which nobody proposed.
A fair reply
“The boss still fights back. It’s just a bit slower, and only for people who turn it on.”
Often confused with
- Red herring
A red herring changes the subject. A straw man stays on the subject but distorts the opponent’s position.
- Motte-and-bailey
In a motte-and-bailey, the arguer swaps between their own bold and modest claims. In a straw man, the critic distorts the other side’s claim.
Where the name comes from
A straw man is a dummy stuffed with straw, like a scarecrow: it looks like a person but can’t fight back. Knock it down and you’ve beaten nobody. Man of straw and strawman are other ways of writing the same picture. Refutation by caricature means beating a cartoon: a caricature exaggerates someone’s features until they’re easy to mock.
The phrase “man of straw” for an easily beaten imaginary opponent has been traced to about 1620, and Isaac Watts described the tactic in his Logick (1724). The popular story about men with straw in their shoes selling false testimony outside courthouses is a false etymology.
Sources
In the app
Practice spotting it on arguments that sound real.
Steelman has more examples of straw man, how to answer it in a real conversation, and practice rounds that mix it with its look-alikes, so you learn the difference, not just the name. Coming soon to iPhone and Android.
You’re on the list.
We’ll email you the day Steelman is out.
Thanks for offering to test. We’ll write before the beta with how to join.